Peer Review Guidelines
1. Move into your PR groups.
2. Determine who will read in what order.
3. Budget 10-15 minutes per person and no more.
4. The reader reads their paper aloud.
5. Give written feedback that offers specific criticism according to criteria below.
6. Put your name on this feedback and give it to the writer.
7. Keep your written feedback and staple it to your final draft.
ENG 101 Assignment Two
Evaluate
the essays in your peer review groups by responding thoughtfully to
each of the following criteria. Focus on the criteria you feel students
should most address in their drafts.
Attach written suggestions from your peers to your final drafts for full peer review credit.
1. Thesis: argument that explains the industrial food system from a psychological perspective. The argument should
address at least three different positions in the industrial food system (animal,
worker, manager are required) in order to explain how this system
functions on a day-to-day basis.
2. Structure: Essay organized around topic sentences; each paragraph provides 'they say' context; essay explains direct quotations (20%)
3. Evidence: Essay
successfully places direct quotes into each body paragraph; essay
cites those quotes correctly according to MLA guidelines; essay
contains a bibliography (20%)
3a. Evidence: integration of outside research into paragraphs (framing, citation, paraphrase); presence of three sources (10%)
4. Critical Thinking: Essay
interprets quotes in original ways that go beyond class discussion;
essay connects main ideas to other texts or moments in text; essay
utilizes keywords and defines them
No comments:
Post a Comment